Thoracic wall blocks: From paravertebral to retrolaminar to serratus to erector spinae and back again - A review of evidence.
Clicks: 268
ID: 29363
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
67.8
/100
268 views
179 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 2 articles by views in best practice & research clinical anaesthesiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A multitude of thoracic wall blocks have been described, including parasternal-intercostal plane, Pecs I and II, serratus anterior plane, paraspinal-intercostal plane, erector spinae plane blocks, and retrolaminar blocks. They are almost all fascial plane blocks, relying on passive spread of local anesthetic to target nerves within the plane or in adjacent tissue compartments. They have emerged as attractive alternatives to thoracic paravertebral and epidural blocks because of their relative simplicity and safety. Although research into these techniques is still at an early stage, the available evidence indicates that they are effective in reducing opioid requirements and improving the pain experience in a wide range of clinical settings. They are best employed as part of multimodal analgesia with other systemic analgesics, rather than as sole anesthetic techniques. Catheters may be beneficial in situations where moderate-to-severe pain is expected for >12 h, although the optimal dosing regimen requires further investigation.
| Reference Key |
chin2019thoracicbest
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Chin, Ki Jinn; |
| Journal | best practice & research clinical anaesthesiology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S1521-6896(19)30004-7
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.