Parameter optimization and analysis of ecosystem models using simulated annealing: A case study at Station P
Clicks: 1
ID: 292857
1995
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,304 of 1,397 articles by views in journal of marine research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,397 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A simulated annealing optimization algorithm is formulated to optimize parameters of ecosystem models. The optimization is used to directly determine the model parameters required to reproduce the observed data. The optimization routine is formulated in a general manner and is easily modified to include additional information on both the desired model output and the model parameters. From the optimization routine, error analysis of the optimal parameters is provided by the error-covariance matrix which gives both the sensitivity of the model to each model parameter and the correlation coefficients between all pairs of model parameters. In addition, the optimization analysis provides a means of assessing the necessary model complexity required to model the available data. To demonstrate the technique, optimal parameters of three different ecosystem model configurations are determined from nitrate, phytoplankton, mesozooplankton and net phytoplankton productivity measurements at Station P. At Station P, error analysis of the optimal parameters indicates that the data are able to resolve up to 10 independent model parameters. This is always less than the number of unknown model parameters indicating that the optimal solutions are not unique. A simple nitrate-phosphate-zooplankton ecosystem is successful at reproducing the observations. To justify the use of a more complicated model at Station P requires additional data to constrain the optimization routine. Although there is evidence supporting the importance of the microbial loop at Station P, without additional ammonium and bacteria measurements one cannot validate a more complicated model that includes these processes.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2089713271
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard J. Matear |
| Journal | journal of marine research |
| Year | 1995 |
| DOI |
10.1357/0022240953213098
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.