An assessment of the use of sediment traps for estimating upper ocean particle fluxes

Clicks: 1
ID: 292517
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #789 of 1,397 articles by views in journal of marine research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,397 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This review provides an assessment of sediment trap accuracy issues by gathering data to address trap hydrodynamics, the problem of zooplankton "swimmers," and the solubilization of material after collection.For each topic, the problem is identified, its magnitude and causes reviewed using selected examples, and an update on methods to correct for the potential bias or minimize the problem using new technologies is presented.To minimize hydrodynamic biases due to flow over the trap mouth, the use of neutrally buoyant sediment traps is encouraged.The influence of swimmers is best minimized using traps that limit zooplankton access to the sample collection chamber.New data on the impact of different swimmer removal protocols at the US time-series sites HOT and BATS are compared and shown to be important.Recent data on solubilization are compiled and assessed suggesting selective losses from sinking particles to the trap supernatant after collection, which may alter both fluxes and ratios of elements in long term and typically deeper trap deployments.Different methods are needed to assess shallow and short-term trap solubilization effects, but thus far new incubation experiments suggest these impacts to be small for most elements.A discussion of trap calibration methods reviews independent assessments of flux, including elemental budgets, particle abundance and flux modeling, and emphasizes the utility of U-Th radionuclide calibration methods.
Reference Key
openalex_W2157211715 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ken O. Buesseler, Avan Antia, Min Chen, Scott W. Fowler, Wilford D. Gardner, Örjan Gustafsson, Koh Harada, Anthony F. Michaels, Michiel M Rutgers van der Loeff, M.M. Sarin, Deborah K. Steinberg, Thomas W. Trull
Journal journal of marine research
Year 2007
DOI
10.1357/002224007781567621
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.