Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria

Clicks: 1
ID: 292100
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #249 of 310 articles by views in european heart journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 310 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In 1994, an International Task Force proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) that facilitated recognition and interpretation of the frequently nonspecific clinical features of ARVC/D. This enabled confirmatory clinical diagnosis in index cases through exclusion of phenocopies and provided a standard on which clinical research and genetic studies could be based. Structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and familial features of the disease were incorporated into the criteria, subdivided into major and minor categories according to the specificity of their association with ARVC/D. At that time, clinical experience with ARVC/D was dominated by symptomatic index cases and sudden cardiac death victims–the overt or severe end of the disease spectrum. Consequently, the 1994 criteria were highly specific but lacked sensitivity for early and familial disease. Revision of the diagnostic criteria provides guidance on the role of emerging diagnostic modalities and advances in the genetics of ARVC/D. The criteria have been modified to incorporate new knowledge and technology to improve diagnostic sensitivity, but with the important requisite of maintaining diagnostic specificity. The approach of classifying structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and genetic features of the disease as major and minor criteria has been maintained. In this modification of the Task Force criteria, quantitative criteria are proposed and abnormalities are defined on the basis of comparison with normal subject data. The present modifications of the Task Force Criteria represent a working framework to improve the diagnosis and management of this condition. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00024505.
Reference Key
openalex_W1826526930 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Gregory M. Marcus, William J. McKenna, D. Sherrill, Cristina Basso, Barbara Bauce, David A. Bluemke, Hugh Calkins, Domenico Corrado, Moniek G.P.J. Cox, James P. Daubert, G Fontaine, Kathleen Gear, Richard N.W. Hauer, Andrea Nava, Michael H. Picard, Nikos Protonotarios, Jeffrey E. Saffitz, Danita M. Yoerger Sanborn, Jonathan S. Steinberg, Harikrishna Tandri, Gaetano Thiene, Jeffrey A. Towbin, Adalena Tsatsopoulou, Thomas Wichter, Wojciech Zaręba
Journal european heart journal
Year 2010
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehq025
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.