New Tables for Multiple Comparisons with a Control
Clicks: 1
ID: 290037
1964
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #139 of 238 articles by views in biometrics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 238 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Some time ago, a multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments simultaneously with a control or standard treatment was introduced by the present author (Dunnett [1955]). The procedure was designed to be used either to test the significance of the differences between each of the treatments and the control with a stated value 1 - P for the joint significance level, or to set confidence limits on the true values of the treatment differences from the control with a stated value P for the joint confidence coefficient. Thus the procedure has the property of controlling the experimentwise, rather than the per-comparison, error rate associated with the comparisons, in common with the multiple comparison procedures of Tukey [unpublished] and Scheffe [1953]. In the earlier paper, tables were provided enabling up to nine treatments to be compared with a control with joint confidence coefficient either .95 or .99. Tables for both one-sided and two-sided comparisons were given but, as explained in the paper, the two-sided values were inexact for the case of more than two comparisons as a result of an approximation which had to be made in the computations. The main purpose of the present paper is to give the exact tables for making two-sided comparisons. The necessary computations were done on a General Precision LGP-30 electronic computer, by a method described in section 3 below. The tables are given here as Tables II and III; these replace Tables 2a and 2b, respectively, of the previous paper. In addition to providing the exact values, a method is given for adjusting the tabulated values to cover the situation where the variance of the control mean is smaller than the variance of the treatment means, as occurs for example when a greater number of observations is allocated to the control than to any of the test treatments. Furthermore, the number of treatments which may be simultaneously compared with a control has been extended to twenty. 482
| Reference Key |
openalex_W3023211482
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles W. Dunnett |
| Journal | biometrics |
| Year | 1964 |
| DOI |
10.2307/2528490
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.