Comparing Individual Means in the Analysis of Variance

Clicks: 2
ID: 289791
1949
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #188 of 238 articles by views in biometrics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 238 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The practitioner of the analysis of variance often wants to draw as many conclusions as are reasonable about the relation of the true means for individual treatments, and a statement by the F-test (or the z-test) that they are not all alike leaves him thoroughly unsatisfied. The problem of breaking up the treatment means into distinguishable groups has not been discussed at much length, the solutions given in the various textbooks differ and, what is more important, seem solely based on intuition. After discussing the problem on a basis combining intuition with some hard, cold facts about the distributions of certain test quantities (or statistics) a simple and definite procedure is proposed for dividing treatments into distinguishable groups, and for determining that the treatments within some of these groups are different, although there is not enough evidence to say which is which. The procedure is illustrated on examples.
Reference Key
openalex_W2318802957 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors John W. Tukey
Journal biometrics
Year 1949
DOI
10.2307/3001913
URL
https://doi.org/10.2307/3001913
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.