Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Clicks: 1
ID: 289198
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #107 of 192 articles by views in review of financial studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 192 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Journal Article Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches Get access Mitchell A. Petersen Mitchell A. Petersen Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 22, Issue 1, January 2009, Pages 435–480, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053 Published: 03 June 2008
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (48 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W3125688476
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mitchell A. Petersen |
| Journal | review of financial studies |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
10.1093/rfs/hhn053
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.