The Pleistocene footprints are younger than we thought « Earth & Environmental Science# « Cambridge Core Blog
Clicks: 2
ID: 288827
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1,184 of 1,244 articles by views in ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,244 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The date when the first Homo sapiens arrived in the Americas has been a subject of investigation and speculation for decades. First with a reliance on dated archeological evidence, and later supported by genetic studies, an emerging scientific consensus had developed that supported no earlier an occupation of the Americas than 17,500 years ago (see
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (54 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1761421830_68fd2a066df23
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
10.1126/science.aat5447).
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.