Parsing Factional Affiliations among Chinese Political Elites
Clicks: 2
ID: 288714
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1,083 of 1,244 articles by views in ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,244 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
摘要对于中国政治的研究者而言,关心的不是派系是否重要,而是派系如何识别?但在现实政治中,政治人物的派系归属经常隐而不显,需要学者耐心尝试解析。对中国派系的厘清也因而经历三个世代的发展:分别以“传闻轶事”、“关系基础”与“扈从联系”为标准。本文对它们进行了系统的评述,并在蒋俊彦“任内拔擢”标准的基础上,提出“不次拔擢”和“拔擢培养”的改进识别方式。继而利用2000-2020年中国地市市委书记的数据进行经验检测,发现:(1)“关系基础”的标准未必可靠;(2)“任内拔擢”的标准仍可改进;(3)“不次拔擢”和“拔擢培养”最有助厘清派系归属。换言之,本文在回顾、考察既有方案的基础上,提炼出更适用于派系归属的识别标准。本研究因此不仅有助破解中国政治中的派系之谜,还为比较政治精英研究找到识别“人的因素”的可能办法
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (1 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1761421341_68fd281d4c215
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Baoqing Pang |
| Journal | ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.1017/S0305741025100957
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.