A Double Whammy for the History of Evangelical Protestantism

Clicks: 1
ID: 288134
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #855 of 1,244 articles by views in ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,244 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Most histories fail to convincingly explain why 81 percent of American white evangelical voters supported Trump in the 2016 election. Many scholars, like political pundits, hold an idealized vision of the evangelical past, which leads them to assume that “real” evangelicals are actually not so enthusiastic about the deeply anti-intellectual, frankly authoritarian, materialistic, and sexually promiscuous media personality who won the White House. The history of evangelical thought and action after all includes many examples of sensible, humane, and intellectually creative work. How could such a wholesome religious tradition as evangelical Protestantism possibly share responsibility for the political success of Donald Trump?
Reference Key
persistent_1761420383_68fd245f0efca Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors David A. Hollinger
Journal ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE
Year 2020
DOI
10.1017/mah.2020.10
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.