What Makes a Good Review Article or Profile « Classics# « Cambridge Core Blog
Clicks: 4
ID: 287862
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
0.9
/100
4 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #174 of 1,244 articles by views in ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,244 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Classical Review has recently expanded its standard work of publishing reviews and notices of single books to include also longer pieces covering more – and more varied – material. We have previously shared ideas about what makes a good book review and on our work in reviewing digital projects. Here we shed light on how
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (53 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1761420001_68fd22e172376
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.