Comparative Performance Analysis of Algorithm Applications Used in Determining EVFCS Locations

Clicks: 5
ID: 287736
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #18 of 38 articles by views in karadeniz fen bilimleri dergisi

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
With the increasing population, using petroleum and its derivatives in transportation has caused serious environmental problems, including global warming and urban air pollution. This situation has led to the widespread adoption of alternative fuel vehicles, especially Electric Vehicles (EVs), and determining station locations has become a popular research topic. Among the contributions of these studies to the literature are identifying the optimal locations for fast charging stations and space planning. Although numerous routing and charging calculation programs exist for EVs, nature-inspired optimization algorithms can be a valuable approach to addressing the challenges in routing and optimal placement. At the current stage of EV technology, when parameters such as vehicle range and available charging station locations are considered, there is a shortage of charging stations to facilitate efficient intercity travel. Therefore, determining the optimal locations for Electric Vehicles Fast Charging Stations (EVFCS) is a vital issue that needs to be addressed. Failure to identify optimal locations and to adequately plan fast charging stations may lead to problems for both EV owners and charging system operators, such as failing to meet charging demand at the desired level or underutilizing the planned fast charging stations. The main objective of station location planning is to obtain an optimal solution that maximizes the flow volume while simultaneously minimizing the installation costs of charging stations. This paper presents a comparative review of various EV optimal positioning techniques and algorithms used. In addition, it aims to determine the most suitable EVFCS points within the boundaries of Kavacik region of Beykoz district of Istanbul province by applying the geographical proximity-based Haversine algorithm and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) algorithms, which are Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, separately.
Reference Key
persistent_1760865400_68f4ac78d1551 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Onur Akar
Journal karadeniz fen bilimleri dergisi
Year 2025
DOI
10.31466/kfbd.1699614
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.