Postcolonial-interreligious dialogue: A case study of the Silsilah Dialogue Movement

Clicks: 3
ID: 287706
2023
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #880 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This dissertation examines how the Silsilah Dialogue Movement (SDM) can be analyzed and further enhanced by a postcolonial-interreligious perspective. Using various perspectives from postcolonial theologians, this dissertation appropriates an Asian postcolonial approach to interreligious dialogue (IRD), as well as, Andrew Orton’s Interfaith Dialogue: Seven Key Questions for Theory, Policy and Practice. These were used as lens to analyze the SDM in Zamboanga, Mindanao. The study employs qualitative methods such as participant observation, interviews, and focus group discussion to collect data and engage in theological discourse. Interviews were transcribed, read, and processed using thematic analysis. The data gathered and interpreted in this research came from the insights from the members and leaders of SDM. The study shows that SDM possesses the following features of an Asian-postcolonial approach to IRD. 1) It is inclusive-pluralist, that is, it believes that multiple religions can coexist. In the SDM, one finds the active participation of women and the youth, grassroot sectors that are not often seen in traditional IRD. It also includes non-Islamic indigenous groups in the dialogue. indigenous peoples. 2) It is liberationist; it is not only confined to “religious concerns” but addresses socio-economic roots of conflict between Muslims and Christians/indigenous groups 3) It is contextualized or inculturated. It is inspired by Sufism which is the Islamic tradition that first found its way to the Philippines and blends well with folk practices. It also gives central importance to the Asian concept of harmony. 4) The goal of IRD for SDM is harmony which does not aim at abolishing difference (intra and interreligious differences) but rather at enriching one’s own religious heritage in the encounter with others. A significant feature of SDM as an Asian postcolonial IRD is its holistic approach; it fosters a Culture of Dialogue (COD) –dialogue with God, Self, Others, and Creation –as a path to peace. However, from a postcolonial perspective, SDM still has to recognize the importance of gender as an issue that is integral to IRD from an intra-religious and inter-religious perspective. It has not engaged as well in intrareligious dialogue.
Reference Key
persistent_1760662412_68f1938cdc129 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Corpuz, Jeff Clyde Guillermo
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2023
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdd_tred/6
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.