Addressing learner errors through the S.E.R.O. model wrong answer note system

Clicks: 2
ID: 287645
2019
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #1,574 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study investigated how twenty-nine (29) students taking up the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) strand in a private exclusive all girls high school in Quezon City address the learner errors in their quizzes through an intervention called the S.E.R.O. Model Wrong Answer Note System (Ha, 2013; Ha & Kim, 2015). As the teacher-researcher graded the papers, the correct answers were categorized as either S (Strength) or E (Emergency) while incorrect answers were categorized as either R (Risk) or O (Opportunity). Those categorized as R and O were asked to utilize the Wrong Answer Note (WAN). The study used a concurrent triangulation mixed methods research design. Quantitative data consisted of scores in the written assessments and other information that required statistical treatment and qualitative data consisted of student’s reflection in the WAN. The data were corroborated to yield meaningful interpretations. Results show large significant difference between any paired up written assessments – diagnostic test, quizzes, and summative assessment. Thus, indicating that the use of WAN is an effective tool in addressing learner errors. Moreover, the total number of students who obtained R and O in the summative assessment (post-test instrument) was evidently lower in comparison with the diagnostic test (pre-test instrument). Some student responses which were initially classified as O in their diagnostic test manifested understanding of related concepts and acquisition of necessary skills and attained S or at least R.
Reference Key
persistent_1760662219_68f192cbd185f Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Reyes, Ronald Christopher S.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2019
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6295
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.