Effects of using metacognitive strategies in teaching physics problem-solving
Clicks: 1
ID: 287630
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #3,731 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A common scenario that a Physics teacher would encounter are students saying that they already understand the concepts but just cannot do the problem solving. This study used metacognitive strategies in teaching Physics problem-solving to Grade 12 Senior High School students (N=53) of Las Pinas National High School Main under Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) strand on a two-week implementation to determine its effect on Physics Problem-Solving performance. The metacognitive strategies that were used were Exam Wrapper, Exit Ticket, Metacognitive Modelling, Metacognitive Note Taking, Logical Problem-Solving, and Think-Pair-Square (TPS) Strategy. It employed a pretest-postest quasi experimental design and mixed method approach. The study revealed that before the implementation, all the students (N=40) were described to have a Below Beginning level of Physics Problem-Solving skills. The identified primary difficulty was analyzing the problem. Additionally, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test showed that the performance of the student before and after the intervention was significantly different p < 0.001, α = 0.05 with a medium effect size of 0.62. And significant relationship was also found using Spearman’s rank order correlation, r = .71and, r = .71 and the p-value < 0.001, α = 0.01.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760662173_68f1929dd90b1
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bangga, Dionafer |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.