Implementation of collaborative learning in an online mathematics class

Clicks: 1
ID: 287602
2022
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3,708 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This classroom-based action research aimed to determine the applicability of implementing Collaborative Learning in online setting. This study intended to implement collaborative learning in an online class setting to help students develop their interaction with one another and improve their academic performance. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from an intact class which yielded only 20 valid responses. These participants were from the grade 8 pilot section of a public school in an urban community. Quantitative data were taken from Student Attitude Survey, individual and group activity sheets, and achievement test, while qualitative data were taken from focus group discussions. Triangulation was also used in obtaining data from the transcripts of the online collaborative learning, that were analyzed using content analysis with respect to Garrison’s Practical Inquiry Model. Results showed that there is a significant increase of scores in the activities done collaboratively than done individually. However, the achievement test, which was given after the intervention, revealed very low raw percentage scores, where only 2 participants passed. When the raw percentage scores were the transmuted, the raw percentage scores have improved and 12 people already passed. Additionally, results of the content analysis of the video recording transcripts show that among the four categories of Garrison’s Practical Inquiry Model – triggering events, exploration, integration, and resolution – integration and exploration are the categories with the most frequency of messages during online collaborative learning. In terms of students’ attitudes toward the intervention, the results indicated a positive response with regard to their experience with online collaborative learning. The focus group discussions were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis and it revealed that there were similarities and differences in collaborative learning between an online and face-to face learning. Moreover, students’ participation during online collaborative learning made use of the first three stages of Siemen’s Connectivism taxonomy.
Reference Key
persistent_1760662093_68f1924d940a2 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mapile, Romyna Fortuna G.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2022
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/22
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.