Collaborative design and development of the research-focused module of the Coastal Scouts Auxiliary program
Clicks: 2
ID: 287556
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #3,399 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The “Ikaapat na Hakbang” module is designed for the Coastal Scouts Auxiliary (CSA) program in Senior High School, which integrates three key dimensions: (1) a place-based environmental education framework; (2) learning to do science; and (3) the principles of teaching research in SHS. The purpose of the study is to engage CSA implementers in a collaborative sensemaking process, where they interpret and translate the Instructional Design Framework (IDF) into the structure and content of the module. This study explored the co-design process with particular attention to (1) the perspectives of participating educators during the initial design phase and (2) the productive tensions that shaped the development of the module’s framework. Guided by a Design-Based Implementation Research (DBIR) methodology, the study iteratively designed and refined the module through a Researcher-Practitioner Partnership (RPP) between the researcher and CSA implementers. Data sources included co-design workshops, interviews, observations, and evolving module drafts. The findings reveal a shared pedagogical commitment to transforming research instruction into a dynamic, as-the-needs-rise approach to teaching methods. The module was envisioned as an apprenticeship-based, workshop or camp-like experience rooted in local relevance, reflective practice, and community engagement. Throughout the co-design process, tensions emerged around structured curriculum, conventional instruction versus responsive teaching, instruction, and pedagogy, scientific neutrality versus epistemological reflexivity, and ethical responsibilities in research communication. These tensions, rather than hindering development, became generative forces that clarified the module’s pedagogical priorities. Ultimately, the co-design process itself became a model of reflective, collaborative curriculum developed for teaching research that is rooted in place, practice, and partnership.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760661961_68f191c9a1069
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Madrazo, Leah D. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.