How tiered learning stations (TLS) foster grade 10 students’ productive participation in constructing quality scientific explanations: A multiple case study in a Canadian science classroom

Clicks: 4
ID: 287552
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #2,932 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study explored how Tiered Learning Stations (TLS) supported Grade 10 students in constructing scientific explanations and participating productively in science lessons. Conducted in a secondary school in BC, Canada, the school followed the BC curriculum, which emphasizes the development of students' core competencies. To examine this, a multiple case study approach was employed, focusing on three students with varying CEFR levels. Namely, Student A (C2), Student B (B1), and Student C (A2) were selected to represent active, passive, and non-verbal participation styles, respectively. Using the exploratory qualitative approach, a multiple case analysis of three (3) students with different participation levels (active, passive, and no participation) was the main focus of this study. The data included audio and video recordings, student worksheets, surveys administered to the students, and observation notes. These were thematically analyzed using the constant comparison method with a priori themes from literature on the different levels of participation and the criteria for good scientific explanation. Findings showed that TLS provided flexible learning opportunities suitable for each student’s strengths and language proficiency. Student A regularly participated in group tasks, which helped her produce well-developed explanations. Student B showed limited participation but became more active in Lesson 3, where her verbal contribution aligned with her strongest written explanation. Student C, although silent throughout all group activities, demonstrated deep understanding through written and visual tasks, showing that participation can also occur non-verbally. The tiered structure of the stations, from concept recall to real-world application, guided the students’ thinking and supported different ways of expressing understanding. Stations 4 and 5, in particular, allowed students to apply science creatively and reflect on social or ethical implications. Survey responses from the whole class confirmed these trends, with many students reporting increased confidence, especially in scientific writing and when working with visuals. Overall, this study found that the use of TLS fostered inclusive and meaningful participation in the classroom. By providing structured and differentiated tasks, TLS supported the students in constructing quality scientific explanations, regardless of their language level. Keywords: British Columbia (BC) core competencies, Emergent Bilinguals (EBs), productive participation, science education, scientific explanation, Tiered Learning Stations (TLS)
Reference Key
persistent_1760661941_68f191b5aaa1c Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Carpio, Donnalyn Tabiando
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2025
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/75
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.