Integrative hypothetical "teaching" trajectory for technologically-culturally sustaining paradidactic praxeologies in mathematics: A critical dialectical pluralism approach
Clicks: 1
ID: 287500
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #3,663 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this study, I adapted the term Integrative Hypothetical “Teaching” Trajectory (IHTT), a model designed to develop mathematical teaching pathways that are both technologically and culturally sustaining. This model is grounded in the concept of paradidactic praxeology, which consists of two interconnected blocks: the praxis (i.e., Type of Task [T_pd] and Technique [τ_pd]) and the logos (i.e., Technology [θ_pd] and Theory [Θ_pd]). The IHTT framework was inspired by my previous and ongoing collaborations with indigenous teachers, as well as by recent literature on emerging trends in mathematics education. These influences led me to pose the question: How can teachers adapt to technological innovations while remaining rooted in their cultural identity? Employing a design-based research approach and guided by the methodological principles of critical dialectical pluralism, the development of the IHTT unfolded across three phases with the participation of 11 teachers, 3 ethnomathematicians, 3 educational technology practitioners, and 2 expert teachers. During the design and planning phase, a review of seminal theories, practitioners’ epistemological and ontological beliefs, and teachers’ existing praxeologies informed the initial design of the IHTT. Cultural elements such as batek and laga from the Kalinga province were integrated as exemplars of cultural characteristics, while laptops and projectors served as the technological resources. In the instructional design phase, a series of focus group discussions supported the implementation and refinement of the IHTT, with particular attention given to the evolution of τ_pd and their justifications through θ_pd and Θ_pd, anchored in a clearly defined T_pd. Finally, in the retrospective analysis phase, the IHTT was found to be effective in supporting the design of instruction that is both technologically relevant and culturally sustaining. Significant improvements were observed in teachers’ praxeologies, including the development of more diverse and systematic τ_pd from a defined T_pd, stronger rationale through θ_pd, and deeper alignment with broader educational theory via Θ_pd. These findings further informed the overall structure of the paradidactic praxeology (T_pd, τ_pd, θ_pd, Θ_pd). It is anticipated that the IHTT will continue to serve as a viable framework for supporting teachers as they navigate emerging trends in mathematics education while maintaining their cultural identity and context.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760661782_68f19116961bf
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hortelano, Julius Ceasar C. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.