The implications of evolutionary psychology's modular theory of mind on the freewill debate
Clicks: 1
ID: 287114
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #3,500 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study examines the implications of the modular theory of mind of Evolutionary Psychology on the debates regarding free will. Evolutionary Psychology puts forward a unique perspective concerning how the mind works which has a critical bearing on the concept of human free will. In this light, the main objective of this study is to examine and determine the free will theory which can best take into account the findings in Evolutionary Psychology. Evolutionary psychologists claim that the mind is like a computer in that it is capable of making computations which can help people solve various problems in the most efficient way. They also claim that the mind possesses mental mechanisms called modules that induce people to act in a certain way whenever they encounter certain conditions. These modules were inherited from our hunter-gatherer ancestors. During prehistoric times our hunter-gatherer ancestors encountered various problems on a regular basis which prompted them to formulate solutions to those problems. Since those problems occurred regularly, their solutions to those problems were retained and became a feature of their minds. These features are called modules by evolutionary psychologists. These modules exert a certain degree of influence on peoples behavior whenever they encounter situations similar to those encountered by our hunter-gatherer ancestors. This study argues that the free will theory that could best accomodate the findings in Evolutionary Psychology is Compatibilism. Compatibilist thought is compatible with the theory of mind advanced by Evolutionary Psychology because it complements the requirements advanced by compatibilists for people to exercise free will. Compatibilists basically argue that even if there are various factors which determine peoples behavior it does not hinder people from making free choices because they can choose to do otherwise than what they first intended to do after some careful deliberation. Furthermore, they see it necessary that people possess a certain degree of rationality that enables them to examine all the options available to them in order to be able to make informed choices. These features cohere well with or are accounted for by how the Modular Theory of Mind of Evolutionary Psychology describes the nature of the human mind; namely, that it has inherited problem-solving mechanisms, that it works computationally, and that it is flexible enough to adapt to the changes in its environment.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760660635_68f18c9bdcdab
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Esguerra, James Victor M. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.