A comparative study of two philosophies of hope: Cardinal Nguyen van Thuan and Gabriel Marcel
Clicks: 2
ID: 287096
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #3,667 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This dissertation is a critical appraisal of Cardinal Francis Xavier Nguyen Van Thuan philosophy of hope, specifically his idea of hope as a road. For the Cardinal, the Road of Hope ties the act of hoping to our responsibility to others who are reflections of God goodness. This is compared to Gabriel Marcel's view that hope is our desire to be freed from existential despair. Finally, this dissertation argues that the Cardinal's insights about hope lead to an interesting theory of ethics grounded on God's divine will. This theory is from an Asian Catholic perspective.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760660585_68f18c69533eb
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Thanh, Nguyen Quang |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.