Intersectional and ethical assessment of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 (Republic act no. 10354) and the proposed Anti-Discrimination Act (Senate bill no. 1271) via personal narratives of selected LGBT activists

Clicks: 1
ID: 287091
2019
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3,659 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The study is a philosophical analysis on identity politics and policy ethics, with special focus on two key pieces of legislation in the Philippines: the Reproductive Health Bill (RHB), signed as the “Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012” (Republic Act No. 10354) and the Anti-Discrimination Bill (ADB) or the “Proposed Anti-Discrimination Act (Senate Bill No. 1271)” using an intersectional approach in theorizing the concepts of lived identities (such as sex, gender, sexual orientation, among others) and the contextual practice of LGBT activists in their LGBT (Human) Rights advocacy work. By utilizing the key informant interviews and presenting the personal narratives of key informants, the study displayed the lived experience of advocacy work in lobbying for the two bills that are framed in human rights discourse in the interlocking areas of bioethics, reproductive and sexual rights, equality and anti-discrimination, and policy ethics. Intersectional theory and practice is evidenced and strengthens the human rights framework but although intersectionality in the Philippine context (balandra) is enhanced by the ethics of care, the study finds and refines various modes of caring among activists (pangangalaga, pakikialam, pag-aaruga). The study fills the gap in local scholarship on the LGBT movement, policy ethics, and its applications in care ethics.
Reference Key
persistent_1760660570_68f18c5ad5692 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Manauat, Natividad Dominique G.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2019
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/1425
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.