A hooksian critique of Spady's outcomes-based framework as applied in the Philippines
Clicks: 3
ID: 287087
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #3,080 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This dissertation employs bell hooks’ feminist philosophy of education as a critique of the philo- sophical foundations of Outcome-Based Education. Specifically, it asks: From a hooksian framework of critique, how does William Spady’s philosophy of education as reflected in the Philippine’s institutionalization of OBE in the country’s educational system engender oppres- sion? The study employs a critical analysis of the text and language of OBE in the original
works of Spady and in the documents of its institutionalization in the Philippine educational sys- tem and points out its limitations in the light of the feminist educational philosophy of bell hooks. It argues that OBE rests on shaky philosophical foundations and that the claims of OBE’s pragmatist and constructivist roots have no merit either on the level of Spady’s theoretical level or at the level of its implementation in the Philippine setting. A hooksian critique critically sees that underlying Philippine OBE is a new dominant structure that embeds not only the learner but also the teacher in a neoliberal system that perpetuates and strengthens existing modes of oppres- sion and inequalities of various types (gender, class, ethnicities, etc.). It also sees OBE as inade- quate to address, much more correct, the basic deficiencies of the Philippine tertiary education system it purports to resolve and that instead of correcting such flaws, OBE ignores them and perpetuates them in principle through policy and implementation.
Keywords: Philosophy of education, feminism, outcome-based education, bell hooks, Philippine education
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760660556_68f18c4c846a6
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Florendo, Jonathan G. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.