Levina's ethics and the phenomenon of dignity
Clicks: 1
ID: 287083
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #3,572 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In the history of Western philosophy, the metaphysical discourse has always drawn attention to the self and Supreme Being. But with the rise of modernity (ushered in by Rene Descartes in the world of philosophy), there has been a radical shift from the angle of the Supreme Being to an anthropological one. Contemporary society, however, has become too secular to the extent that the focus is always about what satisfies the self. This development, which resulted in destructive movements like the Nazi’s Socialist Party, moved Levinas to write his magnus opus, Totality and Infinity (1969), which is a profound, challenging work that seeks to enlighten humanity about the problem of modern alienation. Levinas believes that philosophy, especially in the area of moral philosophy before his time, had been too egoistic. In view of this, Levinas proposes a kind of ethics not primarily based on moral principles or rules, exemplified by the Kantian Categorical Imperative, which defines our moral relationship with the others in terms of following moral rules. It is an ethics that focuses on our moral responsibility to respond to the immediate call of the Other for help as expressed through its Face. In responding to this call, a standard way is to follow certain moral principles. This, however, results in appropriating the Other to the I, thereby undermining, or “forgetting,” the “transcendental” dignity of the Other (referring to the unique/internal/essential worth of the Other that transcends any categorization). Assumed in these moral rules is a certain definition of human dignity that is imposed on those to whom these rules are applied. In this paper, I demonstrate that this tension between the Face and transcendental dignity of the Other can be resolved through Levinas’ concept of substitution. Through substitution, the I responds to the Face of the Other while preserving its essential dignity.
Key words: Face, Other, Transcendental dignity, Substitution, Infinity.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760660545_68f18c412f8f6
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Boakye, Anthony K. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.