Reclaiming the womb: Towards an Irigarayan direction of the monstrous womb in pregnancy horror films

Clicks: 2
ID: 287021
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #3,493 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Horror films have served as space to propagate the victimization, objectification, and sometimes villainization of women. Among many of the female archetypes in horror, the so-called monstrous womb of the monstrous feminine archetype coined by Barbara Creed highlights this feature most. It is argued that the maternal body is considered as an “abjection” ⎯ that which disturbs identity, order, and boundaries ⎯ thus, the feminine/womb labeled as monstrous. The grotesque reimagining of pregnancy and childbirth in horror films underscores the sexual difference between men and women, insofar that women are portrayed to experience drastic changes in their bodies during pregnancy and an abnormal life form growing inside/coming outside of them through childbirth. This highlights the problem of sexual difference that Irigaray talks about. In her theory, she argues that the construction of the concept of “human” has been framed by the language, culture, and laws from the male perspective, thus disregarding the female perspective and experience. Moreover, pregnant women in horror films have persisted to be portrayed as as monstrous because of deeply entrenched ideas set by the symbolic order. Following her theory, structural change must be made in the way women are viewed as subject/object especially in mediums such as horror films that propagate this. In this paper, I shall reveal that it is possible to deviate from the phallocentric notion of the monstrous womb exhibited in horror films by centering a film’s narrative on the female experience of pregnancy and subjectivity. The goal of this paper is twofold: 1.) To shift the discourse of the monstrous womb to a female perspective; and 2.) To use this perspective of the monstrous womb in the context of sexual difference. As such, I claim that there is no such thing as a monstrous womb and that its depiction in horror films must be well represented by a woman’s lived experience of pregnancy, subjectivity, and embodiment. Furthermore, the theory of sexual difference shall be used as a framework to strategically mimic and subvert the depiction of the womb in an ontological and existential dimension through an analysis of the film, Huesera: The Bone Woman.
Reference Key
persistent_1760660353_68f18b812949f Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Aldecoa, Cristina Louise B
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2025
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdb_philo/20
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.