Accepting refugees: Amendments on the Philippine Immigration Act to harmonize it with the minimum standards on international law
Clicks: 5
ID: 286407
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
1.2
/100
5 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #662 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
State responsibility starts with addressing root causes of forced displacement. Strengthening the rule of law and providing citizens with security, justice, and equal opportunities are crucial to breaking the cycles of violence, abuse and discrimination that can lead to displacement. In the Philippines, it does not have a concrete law to comply with the minimum standards of refugee protection based on international law. In this study, the researchers will address the issue on whether or not the Philippine Immigration Act must be updated to be able to comply with the minimum international standards on refugee protection. In sum, the researchers observed that under the UN Refugee Agency, “to be recognized as a refugee, a person must have a well-founded fear of being persecuted if returned to his country of origin.” As found, the foreign laws have a similar definition of refugee. However, these laws emphasize on the principle that the refugees should not be forcibly returned to a territory where their freedom is restrained. Therefore, the researchers recommend that the definition by the UN Refugee Agency should be the standard definition of refugee because this definition clearly covers the circumstances on why refugees shall not be forcibly returned to their own country. Moreover, the Philippine Immigration Act should be amended in terms of including the UN Refugee Agency’s definition. Furthermore, the researchers found that the local laws and issuances, especially the Philippine Immigration Act, lack the necessary standards to protect refugees coming to the Philippines. The Philippine Immigration Act should further define what a refugee is in accordance with the definition of the UN Refugee Agency. Moreover, it does not provide the process on how the government should assist refugees, nor does it require an allocated budget for refugee protection. Lastly, it lacks a provision on a national asylum which is needed in order for the Philippine government to handle and manage the arrival of the refugees. Therefore, the researchers deem it necessary for the law to be amended in order to include these standards. There is no existing law in the Philippines that specifically covers refugees. The Philippine Immigration Act is not enough to protect and support the refugees, it does not meet the minimum international standards. The researchers believe that in the Philippine setting, private organizations and the United Nations are more active in helping refugees rather than the government. Furthermore, the scope of the Philippine Immigration Act
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760658480_68f18430e0d75
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pascual, Emary Joy D. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.