How legitimate are the expectations? An evaluation of Chinese foreign direct investments in the Philippines under the lens of the fair and equitable treatment standard

Clicks: 1
ID: 286393
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #2,942 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The recent shift towards Sino-Philippines relations came with a wave of developmental possibilities in the form of Chinese enterprises, ventures, investments and even people. Much confidence is placed in linkages that China provides, and may potentially provide. Such development, however, comes with a price. For Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) specifically, the legitimate expectations set by the State as to Chinese FDI oblige the Philippines to protect the same under its International Investment Agreement (IIA) obligations. Employing the doctrinal research analysis, the thesis explores the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard found in IIAs, particularly the element of legitimate expectations, to determine and evaluate possible consequences of the current treatment of Chinese FDI on the Philippines' capacity to review, revamp, or even revoke its participation in these investments. Such analysis allowed the author to nuance arbitral decisions within the heavily dispute-driven investor-State dispute settlement system and analyze the factors that determine tribunals’ decisions. Together with the FET considerations within ISDS, the thesis evaluates investments connected with China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Philippines’ Build, Build, Build (BBB) Program as these are long-term investments with significant impacts on public interest and the overall international investment landscape of the Philippines. The thesis identifies the potential limitations to future State actions as a result of the present treatment of Chinese FDI, and whether such treatment will warrant continued protection from future administrations. Notwithstanding restrictions on State conduct, the thesis likewise identifies when the State’s sovereign rights are to apply over all other FDI obligations, taking into consideration public interest factors such as environmental right issues, the socio-political climate, corruption surrounding the investment, and even human and labor rights concerns.Keywords: International Investment Law, Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard, Legitimate Expectations, Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Build, Build, Build Program, China-Philippines, Chinese FDI, Foreign Direct Investment, Duterte Administration, Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Reference Key
persistent_1760658441_68f1840936447 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors de Vera, Christianne Noelle B.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2021
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.