Negotiation strategies of Filipino-American healthcare advocacy organizations: A study on influencing the legislative process for the medical portability bill

Clicks: 5
ID: 286369
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #334 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study deepens the understanding of how social movements influence policymaking, particularly within minority communities such as Filipino-American healthcare advocacy groups. It argues that these organizations are not merely isolated interest groups but are dynamic social movements grounded in collective identity, shared values, and strategic coalition-building. By drawing on cultural heritage, professional expertise, and community solidarity, they mobilize resources and engage in targeted advocacy that reflects the core elements of social movement dynamics. The study shows how these advocacy groups operate within formal institutions like Congress, using negotiation strategies based on shared belief systems that include core values, policy goals, and tactical approaches. These belief systems help unify members and sustain collective action over time. The research also emphasizes the importance of coalition dynamics, where different advocacy groups with aligned interests collaborate to amplify their political influence. Social movements in policy are often cooperative rather than confrontational, using partnerships and compromise to achieve shared legislative goals. External political changes or crises can either support or hinder these efforts, highlighting the adaptability and resilience of such movements. By framing minority health advocacy as a form of social movement, the study shows how diaspora communities build collective action to reduce health disparities, influence public policy, and advance social justice within democratic systems.
Reference Key
persistent_1760658372_68f183c4c40ae Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Espino, Angelo Gabriel D.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2025
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.