A decision support matrix in enhancing the quality of university’s remote learning: The Philippines settings during COVID-19 pandemic

Clicks: 4
ID: 286330
2022
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #378 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic hampered the global economy and movement of people. Education, which is traditionally delivered in face-to-face settings, was severely affected. This dilemma led to the temporary closure of schools and universities worldwide. To ensure continuity of teaching delivery, academic institutions adopted complete online learning. The sudden adoption of remote learning gained additional feedback from various stakeholders. The Philippines, as a developing economy in Southeast Asia, had reached the mark in terms of the total no. of cumulative cases. Due to this prolonged mode, students shared increasing dissatisfaction towards remote learning. This research aims to understand the causal relationship of dissatisfaction factors, namely: 1) Academic Teaching, 2) Academic Support, 3) Accessibility, 4) Learner and 5) Community Social through Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and 12 Engineering program outcomes designed by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitude. Results show that all dissatisfactions factors directly influence specific program outcomes. SO1, SO2, SO3, SO5, SO9, and SO11 were identified to be critical and need to be attended by HEIs. Then, through Focus Group Discussions, thematic analysis was conducted in determining the list of intervention strategies to address the critical outcomes. Specific strategies were streamlined through Analytical Hierarchy Process. This study generated decision support matrices per program outcomes infused with Service Recovery and Innovation principles.
Reference Key
persistent_1760658253_68f1834d24ad1 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bucu, Gabriel C.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2022
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_induseng/3
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.