The ouster of President Joseph E. Estrada and its effects on Philippine society (1997 2002)
Clicks: 1
ID: 286287
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #3,418 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This thesis analyzes and contextualizes the immediate effects of Estrada's removal from office on Philippine society by highlighting the united opposition's efforts to oust Estrada in EDSA Dos and the pro-Estrada group's attempt to reinstate him in EDSA Tres which both involved a variety of people from multiple sectors of Philippine society. The thesis identifies the different narratives by the pro- and anti-Estrada camps before, during, and after his ouster by looking at his removal as a result of the convergence of the Philippine political, social, financial, and sectarian elite as the opposition. Therefore, EDSA Dos and EDSA Tres were conflicts for power between the elites, the middle-class, and the masa. EDSA Dos, an elite-led people power protest became successful in removing Estrada from office and opened the way for his arrest. Estrada's arrest had angered the already enraged masa, who had felt unheard and ill-treated by the elites and the middle-class who never understood their plight. EDSA Tres became the counter people power to reinstate their champion to power and to unleash their vengeful rage which had been building for the longest time. The elites on both sides, responsible for financing, supporting, and maintaining fiery passions on both sides, were influential and used the middle-class and the masa to achieve their ulterior ambitions. Without the elites, EDSA Dos and Tres would likely have never happened. Lastly, Estrada's ouster set a dangerous precedent for institutionalizing people power as a legitimate form of bringing social and political change that had undermined Philippine democracy and thus made it further volatile, weak, and fragile.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760658127_68f182cf0fbcd
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mariano, Carlos Antonio R. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.