Estimating the excess value of listed Philippine holding companies using panel data econometric techniques

Clicks: 3
ID: 286254
2021
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #2,630 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Holding companies in the Philippines comprise a significant portion of the local stock exchange’s total market capitalization. One puzzle that has hounded holding companies is the diversification discount (i.e. negative excess value) and the imputation of such discount in valuation. Based on multiple theories, the study determined multiple variables that drive excess value of selected holding companies and build a model that provides better estimates than a simple historical average. The results of the study showed that selected variables from agency theory, real options theory variables, internal capital markets resource-based view and industrial organization view are statistically significant explanatory variables based on AIC, BIC and in-sample RMSE. The statistical models derived from stepwise and best subsets procedures provided better estimates (i.e. lower RMSEs) than a simple historical average method but when excess values are stable, paired t-tests revealed that the difference of MAEs of statistical models and the historical average method were not statistically significant. Because of overfitting as evidenced by difference in in-sample RMSEs and out-of-sample RMSEs, a cross-validation LASSO was run. The model (1) expectedly showed higher in-sample error (bias) versus the models from stepwise and best subsets procedures but still significantly better than the averaging method but (2) this is traded off with the lowest out-of-sample error.
Reference Key
persistent_1760658023_68f182676c116 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Matute, Chris Helbert M.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2021
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_finman/1
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.