An analysis of the relationship between financial performance of Microfinance Institutions and the Sustainable Development Goals
Clicks: 2
ID: 286241
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1,676 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A microfinance institution is a financial institution that offers various financial services to people who do not have access to banking. According to the Microfinance Council of the Philippines, Inc. (2010), microfinance sectors in the Philippines are developing when the government started to visualize a sustainable and working financial sector for the less fortunate people. With the establishment of the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015, microfinance is considered to be an enabler to achieving these goals (UNDP, 2019). Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is a plan designed to make a better and sustainable future for everyone around the world, they try to solve the global challenges or problems around the world. The research paper aims to determine the performance of microfinance institutions and banks from 2011 to 2019 in the Philippines and see if it has an impact on the Sustainable Development Goals. A correlation and regression analysis were used by the researchers to analyze the data. The results of the analysis shows that the Operational Efficiency, Capital Adequacy, Liquidity Risk, Credit Risk, and Firm Size has an impact on the Return of Asset (ROA) on the microfinance institutions. On the other hand, the Financial Soundness Indicator 1 has an impact on the Tier 1 Capital to Assets, while the Financial Soundness Indicator 3 does not have an impact on the Liquid Assets to Short-term Liabilities.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760657986_68f182421b5da
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Tan, Carolyn |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.