Cardinality-constrained approach: Small portfolios breakthrough in the Philippine market from January 2015 to December 2019
Clicks: 1
ID: 286229
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #3,010 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Diversification of assets usually implies that a portfolio should contain a large number of assets. However, this paper constructed small but optimal portfolios called cardinality-constrained portfolios that can attain returns as good as large portfolios. This paper specifically constructed 3, 5, and 10-stock portfolios using the 26 consistent stocks of the benchmark Philippine Stock Exchange index (PSEi) for periods 2015-2019. Three statistical tools were applied to build these portfolios and evaluate their performance: the graduated non-convexity method, shrinkage estimator and stationary bootstrap. Aside from rebalancing the cardinality-constrained portfolios weekly and monthly, a cross-sectional analysis for their three- and five- year performances was conducted. Results showed that cardinality-constrained portfolios were able to beat the market based on mean return and Sharpe ratio. Specifically, for the 5-year results of mean returns, the best performing was the 3-stock for weekly rebalancing (0.209) and the 5-stock for monthly rebalancing (0.557). For the 3-year results of mean returns, the best performing was the 10-stock for weekly rebalancing (0.147) and the 3-stock for monthly rebalancing (-0.065). Meanwhile, for the 5-year results of the Sharpe ratio, the best performing was the 5-stock for weekly rebalancing (0.108) and the 3-stock for monthly rebalancing (0.042). For the 3-year results of the Sharpe ratio, the best performing was the 10-stock for weekly rebalancing (0.073) and the 5-stock for monthly rebalancing (-0.022).
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760657952_68f18220649b0
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Zamora, Juliene Faye Palmares |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.