A comparative assessment of Benjamin Graham's stock selection criteria as quantitative investment strategy in ASEAN-5 markets post global financial crisis: An examination of the defensive and enterprising investor approach

Clicks: 2
ID: 286218
2022
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #3,327 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The main purpose of this research is to examine whether or not Benjamin Graham’s Stock Selection Criteria is deemed as a strong quantitative investment strategy using the Sharpe ratio, Jensen's Alpha, Treynor ratio, the beta, Value at Risk and expected returns as performance metrics that will be computed from the values provided by the method of stationary bootstrapping. In addition, the study also compares the performance between two of Benjamin Graham’s stock selection criteria, namely the Defensive and Enterprising Investor from his book, The Intelligent Investor. The research results show that Benjamin Graham’s Stock Selection Criteria is not a strong quantitative investment strategy in all of the ASEAN Countries. This is attributed to the fact that due to the stringent quality of the criteria prescribed by Graham, creating portfolios based on it only leads to fewer securities. Thus, each portfolio lacks diversification. Furthermore, based on the performance metrics, it seems that the Defensive Approach slightly edges out the Enterprising Approach in most of the countries involved in this study. However, it is worth noting that the performances of the Enterprising and Defensive portfolios remain uneven in terms of risk and reward as well as in comparisons to the performances of one another.
Reference Key
persistent_1760657921_68f1820125522 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Panugayan, Ethen Aldrich P.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2022
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdb_finman/43
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.