Smart beta investing: A comparative study of fundamental accounting metrics and traditional market capitalization indices to measure the performance of the Philippine Stock Exchange
Clicks: 1
ID: 286170
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #3,488 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Amidst a dynamic and ever-evolving financial landscape, investors and financial analysts are continuously exploring alternative investment strategies to enhance portfolio performance and mitigate risks. Due to the nature of the program that the authors are taking, they have been showing a keen interest in evaluating the profitability of portfolios. Whether the Philippine Stock Exchange Index (PSEi) provides a sufficient baseline for comparison has been a persistent question. Due to this, a potential alternative benchmark has evolved as a result of the introduction of fundamental indices in the Philippines, which were accompanied by claims that they were superior to the traditional market capitalization-weighted (MCW) index. Hence, the objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of fundamental indices based on accounting metrics on the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) between 2014 to 2020. Specifically, assessing the absolute, relative, and risk-adjusted returns of these indices in comparison to the PSEi. The study found that fundamental indices as applied to the top 31 stocks failed to deliver overperformance compared to the PSEi from 2014-2020. To add, utilizing a regression analysis, the study also revealed that the Fama-French model together with APT variables (proxied by ROE, ROA, EPS, PER) failed to statistically explain the variations of the returns of the fundamental indices. Results show that Market Risk Premium, as reflected in CAPM, is a simple yet relevant model that can be used to estimate and ascertain future returns. Lastly, the empirical investigation done in this study implies that fundamental indices as an alternative investment strategy are not guaranteed to overperform and that the other financial metrics not examined may signify that it may or may not explain the variation of investment returns.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760657784_68f18178cb390
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Merino II, Miguel Antonio Rodriguez |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.