The relationship of learners’ individual differences factors and their engagement in Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) in STEM and HUMSS Context

Clicks: 1
ID: 286060
2023
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3,103 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Written corrective feedback (WCF) has been extensively studied, focusing on the types that encourage substantial repair. However, despite writing teachers' continuous effort in strategizing language instructions, L2 learners still commit errors in following simple grammar rules that should have been mastered in their grade school. The pedagogical and research concern now should focus on determining the engagement of learners in their teachers' WCF and the factors that affect their engagement. This is in the hopes of better low order (e.g., grammar, word choice, and punctuation marks) and high order (e.g., organization and content) writing skills under different learning contexts. Using Ellis's (2010) componential framework, the current study examines the intercorrelations of individual differences (ID) variables (i.e., motivation, beliefs, and preferences) and their direct effect to engagement. Data from STEM and HUMSS students were gathered and compared using structural equations modelling (SEM). Results show that the intercorrelation of motivation to beliefs is strongest in STEM while the intercorrelation of beliefs to preferences is strongest in HUMSS. It was also found that motivation, beliefs, and preferences have direct effect to engagement, with preferences having the highest beta coefficient in both contexts. It is then suggested that writing teachers create more opportunities for error correction and revisit writing curriculum, and more research should be further conducted to reveal the sources of learners' ID variables to eradicate negative emotions towards WCF, which could impede engagement. Keywords: Written Corrective Feedback, L2 Writing, Student's Engagement
Reference Key
persistent_1760657454_68f1802e9818a Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dangaran, Venice Cristine
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2023
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_deal/17
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.