Comparing the use of physical manipulatives and virtual manipulatives in seesaw in improving low-performing incoming first-grade pupils’ achievement in addition
Clicks: 3
ID: 285925
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.6
/100
3 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2,967 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study compares the use of physical manipulatives and virtual manipulatives in Seesaw in improving low-performing incoming first-grade pupils’ achievement in Addition within 20. It explores how pupils perform before and after using the manipulatives, how they demonstrate adaptive mathematical reasoning while using the manipulatives, what their experiences and attitudes are when using the manipulatives, and how using manipulatives can be improved to better teach low-performing pupils. The study employed a single-subject design to explore each pupils’ experiences with the manipulatives. Five pupils were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received instruction with virtual manipulatives while the other received instruction with physical manipulatives. A pretest was administered before the activities and a posttest and survey were administered after. It was found that both the physical and virtual manipulatives did not significantly improve their performance in Addition within 20. It was, however, found that the manipulatives helped pupils transition from concrete experiences to the abstract level of addition, communicate the process of addition, reflect on their work, and correct errors. The pupils had positive experiences with both activities, citing that they enjoyed practicing mathematics skills with the manipulatives, using the different Seesaw features, and using various physical manipulatives.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760657059_68f17ea38190c
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Santiago, Marian Jo Veronica H. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.