Institutionalizing the paradigms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process to enhance the delivery of results in the Philippine Industrial and Labor Dispute Settlement System
Clicks: 3
ID: 285343
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.6
/100
3 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #598 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The evolution of mechanisms designed to resolve industrial and labor disputes from the Court of Industrial Relations established under CA No. 103 (1936) to the current system under the Labor Code (P.D. No. 442 as amended) has resulted in a web of intricate and often overlapping jurisdictions which is continuously plagued by perceptions of inefficiency, ineffectiveness and complication. Thus, the perceived failure of the present system of labor dispute settlement system is characterized by unnecessary delay and corruption.
The study attempts to examine both the policy and mechanism of the labor dispute settlement system in the Philippines and it further attempts to find existing ADR law and Arbitration law and other related laws, policies, programs and jurisprudence that will serve as the forefront of this argument in favor of implementing a holistic and comprehensive ADR approach to the problems besting our industrial and labor dispute resolution system, thus maximizing the policy of the State to actively promote party autonomy and the use of various modes of ADR to make their own arrangement in the resolution of dispute with the greatest cooperation of and the least intervention from the court.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760655328_68f177e0afdb9
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sy, Barton Wong |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.