The selection of ready-mixed concrete (RMC) supplier for DPWH projects using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

Clicks: 1
ID: 285172
2020
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #2,241 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Qualitative and quantitative conflicting factors are associated in the decision-making process of Ready-Mixed Concrete (RMC) supplier selection that makes it a multi-criteria decision problem. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to provide a structured and organized way of evaluating the decision problem. Various literature has been reviewed and consultation with RMC experts have been carried out to identify influencing decision factors in the Philippine context. A decision model hierarchy is established and assessed using pairwise comparisons to derive priority weights among elements in the hierarchy, including the weights of each criterion and alternative RMC Supplier. The project is conducted in the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Region IV-A Office, particularly at the Quality Assurance and Hydrology Division. Results shows that Quality criteria is prioritized among all criteria in the decision model. Furthermore, the quality of raw material is the top global sub-criteria identified. RMC Supplier C is the best supplier based on the accumulated global weights for alternative with respect to the goal of AHP, WAG. With consistency ratio (CR) less than 0.10 in all pairwise comparisons, the judgement is acceptable and valid.er
Reference Key
persistent_1760654836_68f175f4ebac7 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Upao, Hakeem J.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2020
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6360
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.