Emissions and performance of diesel engine using blends of waste cooking oil methyl ester (biodiesel) and diesel
Clicks: 1
ID: 284952
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #2,507 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The emissions and performance of a four-cylinder, four-stroke cycle, direct injection diesel engine fueled by waste cooking oil methyl ester (WCOME) and its blends in 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% percentage volume bases were investigated at engine speeds of 6003,000 rpm, at idle and full load conditions, and the results compared with data using petroleum diesel as fuel.
Levels of smoke opacity and brake specific carbon monoxide (BS-CO), brake specific hydrocarbon (BS-HC), brake specific nitrogen oxide (BS-NOx), and brake specific sulfur dioxide (BS-SO2) were identified using emission analyses while levels of engine performance were defined according to brake horsepower (BHP), brake mean effective pressure (BMEP), brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), and brake thermal efficiency (BTE).
Engine performance showed lower BHPs with a maximum average drop of 8.63% between B100 and diesel. As predicted, BSFCs were lowest for diesel fuel and highest for B100. The BTEs of diesel fuel were also lowest among the fuels tested, with an average difference of 19.93% between diesel and B100. Similarly, lower BMEPs were observed with a maximum drop of 8.63% on the average for B100.
Emissions analyses showed more than 50% reduction in BS-HC, BS-CO, BS-SO2, and smoke opacity when B100 was used, with the average reduction at 97.62%, 90.36%, 98.69%, and 76.19% respectively. BS-NOx were found to be much higher, especially with the engine test run on B100, with the average difference reaching 13,876.60%.
The properties of biodiesel blends (B20, B40, B60, and B80)namely, kinematic viscosity, density, acid value, cloud point, copper strip corrosion, distillation temperature range, pour point, sulfated ash, sulfur content, and gross calorific value were also tested and the results compared against ASTM Standard D6751. Except for acid value, all the results showed values that were far from the limit allowed for B100. It can be concluded, then, that biodiesel blends meet international fuel standards.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760654183_68f173673fa94
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Zakiya, Sheila M. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.