Bayesian classifier for identifying secure CO2 reservoirs
Clicks: 1
ID: 284847
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #2,826 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) and negative emissions technologies (NETs) such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and direct air capture (DAC) systems are necessary for mitigating climate change and attaining net-zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. CCS, BECCS, and DAC rely on geological reservoirs with minimal risk of leakage to permanently store CO2. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been implemented to characterize potential storage sites using geological data which can aid decision-makers in implementing large-scale CCS, BECCS, and DAC. In this study, a naive Bayes classifier is developed using published data of 76 natural CO2 reservoirs from geological surveys for identifying secure reservoirs in the form of interpretable rules. In a trial-and-error process, the data from literature is cleaned and discretized using a 1:1 and 2:1 split. The model is then trained and validated until an optimal model with an accuracy of 90-95% is attained. As a result, a set of IF-THEN rules are generated and can be readily interpreted by decision-makers. Despite the independence assumption (which is hardly true in reality), the Naive Bayes classifier is able to combine simplicity with efficiency and produce accurate predictions. In this work, the model using the 2:1 split has an accuracy of 92.00% with a false positive rate of 33.33% and false negative rate of 4.55%. The rules generated in this study suggest that secure CO2 storage depends on reservoir depths between 1000 and 2500 m, high density CO2, thick caprocks, and no presence of fault. At depths less than 1000 m, the buoyancy pressure exerted on the caprock is more likely to exceed the caprock capillary entry pressure and therefore act as a driving force for CO2 migration. Since CO2 density increases with increasing depth, a site with a greater reservoir depth holding higher CO2 densities is likely more secure. Reservoirs with thick caprocks and without faults can handle greater pressure gradients and prevent fluid movement, hence indicating successful CO2 retention. Adopting these criteria will likely increase the security of engineered CO2 sites.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760653864_68f17228b8fcf
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Lim, Scientifica N. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2022 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.