A qualitative assessment of Philippine-based marine conservation programs using a citizen science evaluation framework

Clicks: 3
ID: 284820
2021
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #655 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
A rising field in academia, citizen science is playing an increasingly important role in scientific research. However, program evaluations and best practices for project implementation involving citizen or participatory science practices and volunteer engagements remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate selected marine citizen science projects in the Philippines using the Citizen Science Evaluation Framework developed by Kieslinger, et al (2018), specifically along the three dimensions of participatory science: scientific impact, learning and empowerment of participants, and the project's impact for wider society. The Citizen Science Evaluation Framework consists of supporting questions answerable by yes or no. And based on the evaluation, each ‘yes’ answer to the questions further indicates that the program is a good model for a citizen science project. Interviews and reviews of project reports were also done to corroborate evaluation data. The open framework used in the study has the potential to be remodeled and developed for marine citizen science projects in the Philippines. Project evaluation using a variety of assessment tools, as was utilized in this study, would make evaluations much stronger and comprehensive. Successful citizen science programs encompass and engage a multi-skilled team of stakeholders, including local volunteers and citizens, academic and research scientists, conservation and management partners, educators, and evaluators. Overall, a proper evaluation framework will help professionalize the citizen science community, foster targeted funding support, and increase the desired impact of citizen science on science and society.
Reference Key
persistent_1760653777_68f171d126cb9 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Maglasang, Ma. Michelle J.
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2021
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_bio/5
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.