The effect of capital adequacy ratio to bank performance of the commercial banks in the Philippines using the CAMEL rating model

Clicks: 6
ID: 284664
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #2,056 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The CAMEL (stands for capital adequacy asset quality management quality earning ability and liquidity) Rating System is one of the various measures used in assessment of bank performance. Literature is rich with studies on how capital affects bank performance. CAMEL however considers capital adequacy as part of the overall bank performance. The study considered capital adequacy as a separate variable which affects bank performance as represented by the other variable in CAMEL. The study also differentiated the effects of capital adequacy to bank performance when represented by the unweighted equity-asset-ratio and the risk-based capital adequacy ratio. The study found that among the capital adequacy affects earning ability and liquidity. Based on the empirical results, increasing capital without consideration as to the type of capital or the risk-weight of asset that capital will fall unto may be a blind move towards improving bank performance. Improving Tier 1 capital may deteriorate bank performance in terms of liquidity and may improve no other category. However, being a regulatory requirement in the Philippines, banks should maintain their Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio at minimum. As for Tier 2 capital adequacy ratio, which can improve bank performance in terms of two categories should be explored and be maximized, depending on the risk that a given bank is willing to take.
Reference Key
persistent_1760653325_68f1700dc233a Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Pangapalan, Jona Lumbao
Journal Malay Journal
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.