The effect of COVID-19 pandemic government response to top global airline stocks’ performance and risk profile as controlled by market returns
Clicks: 3
ID: 284598
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #2,429 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic affected many lives and industries. What started as an unknown disease on December 31, 2019, became a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The virus is passed onto others when an infected person coughs or sneezes. Because of that, governments worldwide imposed policies to control the spread of the virus. Furthermore, the travel and movement of the people have been limited; hence, one of the most affected industries is the airline industry. This research aims to study the effect of COVID-19 pandemic government response (government stringency index / GSI)to top global airline stocks’ performance (stock mean returns) and risk profile (systematic risk/beta) as controlled by market returns. From the list of FlightGlobal’s (2019) global top airlines based on revenues, 49 airline companies were used in this research. All the gathered data were statistically analyzed using a panel data regression analysis. Using the Hausman test, the researchers determined which panel regression analysis model is appropriate for the data. When the fixed-effects model was not used, the BP-LM test was used to analyze to choose between the random effects model and the pooled OLS model. Following the results of the Hausman test and the BP-LM test, the pooled OLS model was used for stock mean returns, while the fixed-effects model was used for systematic risk. As a result of the research, it has been found that market returns have a positive effect on stock performance, while government response has a negative effect on stock performance. Additionally, market returns have no effect on stock risk profile, while government response has a negative effect on stock risk profile.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760653134_68f16f4ed5dff
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Uy, Sean Patrick T. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.