The influence of fraud pentagon model on academic dishonesty of accountancy students in an online setup from the perspective of accounting educators as differed by the educators' gender
Clicks: 4
ID: 284574
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.9
/100
4 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #266 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
With the trend of shifting the traditional setup to online learning, more opportunities for fraud have emerged. As future Certified Public Accountants, integrity and honesty must be instilled as early as the undergraduate level. The Fraud Triangle Model is used to understand and analyze cases of business fraud. Several authors extended it by introducing Capability and External Regulatory Influence into the said model, forming the Fraud Pentagon Model. With the similarity of business fraud and academic dishonesty, it is interesting to use the model as a tool in explaining students' academic behavior. In light of this, the study aims to investigate the influence of Fraud Pentagon Model on academic dishonesty from the perspective of accounting educators. A sample size of 88 from a population of 396 CPAs in Education during the online setup serve as the study's respondents. The data acquired is analyzed using multiple regression analysis and test of difference using T-test. Results show that only Rationalization has significant influence on academic dishonesty and there are no significant differences between male and female perspectives. It is recommended that professional organizations, academic institutions, and professors have empathy, moral imagination and a proactive role to know what goes through the mind of their students and to use that knowledge to hone meaningful relationships with their students and to help cancel students’ wrongful rationalization process. The study also provides relevant information for future researchers.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760653066_68f16f0ae2ab3
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Setias, Joan |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2022 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.