Accounting standards and frameworks consolidation for reporting net-zero in energy companies of ASEAN-5
Clicks: 2
ID: 284528
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1,029 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Several corporations are slowly transitioning to disclose their net-zero initiatives due to the influence of Paris Agreement on various nations; although, the unavailability of a uniform standard causes confusion on the reporting practice that must be followed. This paper focused on ASEAN-5 countries, namely Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Indonesia, specifically the energy sector, as this emits the most greenhouse gases (GHG) (Ge et al., 2020). Moreover, only publicly-listed energy companies that follow a calendar year period, have an English report, act in accordance with the Going Concern principle, and disclose net-zero were analyzed. Using a qualitative research, the researchers evaluated different energy sectors on their method of reporting for net-zero, reviewed reports of ASEAN-5 energy sectors on their system for quantifying their net carbon emissions, compared and contrasted reporting practices across various standards related to disclosing net carbon emissions, and determined relevant regulations that impact the reporting layout of companies across the ASEAN-5 countries. Moreover, the researchers used a frequency distribution table and content analysis. Results show that the most commonly used standard by energy companies was GRI’s Standards, with 52 out of 94 countries. However, upon using the frequency distribution and content analysis, it was seen that the most effective standard in complying with various sustainability measures, especially in reporting net-zero emissions, was the combination of TCFD-GRI-Others.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760652927_68f16e7f819e0
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Tan, Micah Benilde T. |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.