Clinical and cost outcomes of pre-emptive plerixafor administration in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing stem cell mobilization.
Clicks: 350
ID: 28447
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
67.0
/100
350 views
260 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #4 of 5 articles by views in Leukemia research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The stem cell mobilization agent plerixafor significantly improves CD34 stem cell procurement in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. We compared mobilization success rates and costs of two regimens of plerixafor administration: pre-emptive (P-PL, initiated the evening prior to the first day of stem cell collection) and standard (S-PL, initiated the evening prior to the second day of stem cell collection in the event of inadequate collection on the first day).Patients with multiple myeloma undergoing mobilization were categorized as either P-PL or S-PL. Stem cell collection success was evaluated using logistic regression models. Associated costs were aggregated in terms of average collections per patient in each mobilization option (patient level), and escalated to a panel of 5000 patients (population level).299 patients were evaluable; 241 received P-PL and 58 received S-PL. Patients receiving P-PL had higher median CD34 count pre-collection and higher median total CD34 cell harvest on the first collection (6.75 × 10/kg for P-PL, 1.96 × 10/kg for S-PL; P<0.01). In multivariable analyses, P-PL remained significantly associated with the ability to collect ≥2 × 10/kg CD34 on the first day (OR = 4.05, 95% CI, 1.19-13.83, P = 0.03) and ≥5x10/kg CD34 in total (OR = 3.09, 95% CI, 1.04-9.23, P = 0.04). P-PL saved $11,248 (46%) per patient compared with S-PL.P-PL significantly enhanced collection efficiency, with most patients completing collection in 1 day, resulting in substantial cost savings.
| Reference Key |
andritsos2019clinicalleukemia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Andritsos, Leslie A;Huang, Ying;Abraham, Ivo;Huff, Keith;Scrape, Scott R;Fan, Tao;Alkhatib, Nimer;Hofmeister, Craig C;Drea, Edward;McBride, Ali; |
| Journal | Leukemia research |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0145-2126(19)30160-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.