Regulating Generative AI in Scholarly Works: A Policy Brief for Academic Institutions in the Philippines
Clicks: 3
ID: 284082
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #488 of 3,757 articles by views in Malay Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 3,757 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This policy brief aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the regulation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic works, with a primary objective of establishing best practices and strategies for academic institutions, government entities, and civil society in emerging economies, notably the Philippines. It entails a review of the existing regulatory frameworks in various governments and academic institutions while also addressing challenges faced in regulating generative AI, particularly focusing on the intellectual property aspects related to the use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, in academic research content or scholarly works output from such use of tools. The scope encompasses regulations in both developed nations such as Europe, the U.S., and China and developing countries, including Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) members, with a specific emphasis on the Philippine context. In conclusion, this study underscores the transformative potential of generative AI in education, leading to varied regulatory approaches in academic institutions. While some universities have established provisional guidelines for responsible AI use, national governments are still crafting comprehensive policies to navigate the disruptive technology landscape. As a result of this study, we have developed proposals for each stakeholder, providing guidelines and recommendations for academic institutions, government entities, and civil society to create robust regulatory frameworks that foster responsible and innovative AI utilization in academia, address intellectual property concerns, especially on generative AI assistance, and provide clarity on AI technology deployment within educational settings.
| Reference Key |
persistent_1760650949_68f166c5756ef
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Yong, Tae Kim |
| Journal | Malay Journal |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.