A type of simulation which some experimental evidence suggests we don't live in
Clicks: 55
ID: 283539
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
16.2
/100
55 views
22 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #551 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Do we live in a computer simulation? I will present an argument that the
results of a certain experiment constitute empirical evidence that we do not
live in, at least, one type of simulation. The type of simulation ruled out is
very specific. Perhaps that is the price one must pay to make any kind of
Popperian progress.
| Reference Key |
alexander2018a
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Samuel Alexander |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.