Türkçe Dil Modellerinin Performans Karşılaştırması Performance Comparison of Turkish Language Models
Clicks: 17
ID: 283438
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.8
/100
17 views
6 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #794 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The developments that language models have provided in fulfilling almost all
kinds of tasks have attracted the attention of not only researchers but also
the society and have enabled them to become products. There are commercially
successful language models available. However, users may prefer open-source
language models due to cost, data privacy, or regulations. Yet, despite the
increasing number of these models, there is no comprehensive comparison of
their performance for Turkish. This study aims to fill this gap in the
literature. A comparison is made among seven selected language models based on
their contextual learning and question-answering abilities. Turkish datasets
for contextual learning and question-answering were prepared, and both
automatic and human evaluations were conducted. The results show that for
question-answering, continuing pretraining before fine-tuning with
instructional datasets is more successful in adapting multilingual models to
Turkish and that in-context learning performances do not much related to
question-answering performances.
| Reference Key |
amasyali2024trke
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Eren Dogan; M. Egemen Uzun; Atahan Uz; H. Emre Seyrek; Ahmed Zeer; Ezgi Sevi; H. Toprak Kesgin; M. Kaan Yuce; M. Fatih Amasyali |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.